An effective cold chain is fundamental to the success of vaccination programmes. Millions of dollars' worth of vaccines are stored throughout developing countries in the cold chain at any one time; this amount will increase year on year as countries incorporate newer often more expensive, vaccines into their immunization programmes. Vaccines stored outside 2-8 o C lose efficacy and may fail to protect their target population.The result is wasted vaccine and lost lives.
Outside of national vaccine stores the cold chain can be fragile, relying on intermittent electricity supplies and on equipment which may be inefficient or simply not designed to deliver the performance needed in harsh conditions. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that by 2020, developing countries will need to double their electrical power output. The IEA predicts that power outages in developing countries will become even more prevalent in the coming years as National Grids have insufficient capacity to deal with the ever increasing demands put on them
How should we plan to address the issues threatening the integrity of the cold chain? Do we design equipment that will reliably deliver the performance needed on reduced amounts of electricity (say from 8 hours down to 5 or 6 hours)? Do we focus on producing equipment which delivers increased holdover times of days rather than hours?
Simply using generators as an alternative means of producing power has its own problems such as the high cost of fuel, the cost of transporting fuel to remote areas where it is needed, maintenance of generator performance in hot dusty conditions theft of fuel, and increased carbon emissions. Likewise, whilst solar powered fridges may be the solution in some locations, use of solar power to run appliances may not necessarily be the simple solution it seems. Solar fridges are more expensive to produce and buy than those run by electricity, and solar panels continue to be attractive to thieves, requiring expensive replacement.
We cannot afford to ignore issues affecting the integrity of the cold chain. A failure to address these issues now will result in unsuitable equipment being purchased for use with the ensuing failure of the cold chain, wastage of vaccine and loss of lives.
Questions for discussion:
Is the future integrity of the cold chain under threat?
Should the requirement for access to mains power be reduced say from 8 hours down to 5 or 6 hours?
Should holdover times of cold chain equipment be increased, and if so, to what length of time as a minimum?
Under what circumstances can solar refrigeration provide the best solution?
This same refrigerator was the subject of a BBC news item in January. It can be read at:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/northwestwales/hi/people_and_places/newsid_9376000/9376390.stm
For those that are interested, video news items related to the True Energy Vaccine Refrigerators can be found at: http://www.trueenergy.com/news-archive.aspx
And an informative article in New scientist Magazine: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20927944.000-vaccine-fridge-keeps-its-cool-during-10day-power-cut.html
Whether you need temperature controlled packaging, wireless or remote temperature data loggers, cold chain monitoring, a Cold Chain Quality Management System QMS or Cold Chain Validation, Coolpac has a solution for you.
Improving performance of electric refrigeration for vaccines
I believe that this is an important insight - let me comment on three of your questions:
Is the future integrity of the cold chain under threat?
Yes, for several reasons but let me mention one – energy availability. Unreliable kerosene refrigerators, unreliable gas supplies and the high energy consumption of absorption refrigerators are driving cold chain decisions towards more efficient compression cooling using electricity, grid or solar PV. Both of these sources are intermittent and require ice-banks to assure continuous cooling. It has become urgent that we optimize the ‘ice-lined’ or ‘ice-bank’ approach, maximizing the period of autonomy and minimizing the risk of freezing. Unless we demand this higher standard of electric-driven refrigeration for vaccines and apply it throughout the cool chain, we shall see more and more inappropriate ‘domestic’ equipment threatening the security of vaccine storage.
Should the requirement for access to mains power be reduced say from 8 hours down to 5 or 6 hours? And - Should holdover times of cold chain equipment be increased, and if so, to what length of time as a minimum?
These two questions are highly interdependent and the answer is ‘yes’ to both!. The lower the input of electrical power, either grid or solar generated, and the longer the period of ‘holdover’ – the better! A system that can maintain stable cooling with 5 or 6 hours of grid electricity meets the needs of more facilities – especially those that generate their own electricity for a few hours each evening. Similarly, a solar PV system that offers 5 days autonomy where needed with 4.5kWh/24hrs insolation will meet the needs of more facilities than one which offers a maximum of 3days autonomy with a minimum of 5.8 kWh/24hrs. The norms for WHO/PQS prequalification have set ‘the bar’ at the maximum level of performance achievable at the time the norm was last drafted. Given the ‘inertia’ of the system and the speed of equipment development now, this is inevitably conservative. Its time for countries to recognize the availability of superior performance and to demand procurement processes that respect these demands.